Securing Indie AI Stacks: A Complete Tooling Roundup

Written by Rafter Team
January 27, 2026

Indie devs are moving faster than ever — shipping AI features with LangChain, Vercel, OpenAI, Supabase, and a bunch of plugins. But while your stack grows, security often gets left behind.
Prompt injection, key leaks, jailbreaks, and eval gaps are no longer "enterprise problems." Attackers are already probing small apps because indie stacks tend to be the easiest targets.
The good news: there's now a wave of lightweight, developer-friendly AI security tools that you can plug in without needing a CISO. Here's a complete roundup to help you secure your indie AI stack.
Security isn't just for big companies anymore. If you're building an indie AI product, you're sitting on a growing collection of vector DBs, API keys that can rack up massive bills if abused, and models that can be jailbroken with a single clever prompt.
Introduction
Security isn't just for big companies anymore. If you're building an indie AI product, you're sitting on:
- A growing collection of vector DBs and embeddings
- API keys that can rack up massive bills if abused
- Models that can be jailbroken with a single clever prompt
Historically, AI security tooling has been either too academic (papers, frameworks) or too enterprise-heavy (big dashboards, compliance). But that's changing fast.
Today, we have a growing set of developer-friendly, open source, and lightweight tools that help with:
- Prompt injection detection and filtering
- Output validation
- Key management and access control
- Evaluation and red teaming
- Logging and monitoring
This post breaks down these tools into practical categories, with pros, cons, examples, and links — plus how Rafter fits into the mix.
Prompt Injection & Jailbreak Defense Tools
Prompt injection is the #1 real-world attack vector for indie apps. A single cleverly crafted input can trick your model into leaking system prompts, keys, or private data.
Here are the tools worth knowing:
Guardrails AI
- What it does: Schema validation and output filtering for LLM responses
- Why it's good: You can define expected formats and block outputs that don't comply
- Pros: Declarative, fast to integrate with Python or LangChain
- Cons: Primarily focused on output, not input
from guardrails import Guard
guard = Guard.from_pydantic(
output_class=UserProfile,
prompt="Extract user profile information from the text below."
)
guard.validate(llm_output)
Llama Guard
- What it does: Policy-based classifier that flags harmful inputs/outputs
- Why it's good: Great for input filtering before it hits your core model
- Pros: Open source, language-agnostic
- Cons: You need to host the model or wrap it in an API
OpenAI Moderation
- What it does: Built-in moderation endpoint that flags harmful content
- Why it's good: Easiest starting point if you use OpenAI
- Cons: Not customizable, limited coverage for nuanced jailbreaks
Takeaway: Combine input filtering (Llama Guard) + output validation (Guardrails) for a surprisingly strong indie defense layer.
Access Control, Key Management & Secrets
Most AI incidents start with a leaked key. Frontend code, shared env files, or an exposed Vercel preview can give attackers free reign.
Rafter
- What it does: Sits between your app and AI services to handle API key management, incident response, and policies
- Why it's good: Purpose-built for AI stacks. Rotates keys, logs usage, and enforces rules
- Pros: Developer-friendly, easy to plug in
- Cons: Newer ecosystem (but growing quickly)
Vault + Serverless Secrets
Examples: HashiCorp Vault, Vercel env vars, Supabase secrets.
- Why it's good: Battle-tested key storage
- Indie tip: Keep LLM keys server-side only — never expose them in client code
# .env (not committed)
OPENAI_API_KEY="sk-xxxx"
# server.js
const key = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY
LangSmith / LangServe Access Controls
Basic access controls and monitoring layers on top of LangChain apps.
Takeaway: Rotate keys regularly, keep them server-side, and log usage like you would for a database.
Evaluation & Red Teaming Frameworks
Before attackers find the holes in your prompts, you should.
OpenAI Evals
- What it does: Automates evaluation of model behavior, including adversarial tests
- Why it's good: Standardized framework, integrates directly with OpenAI APIs
- Cons: OpenAI-specific, may need adaptation for other models
LangKit
- What it does: Provides evaluation and inspection utilities for LangChain pipelines
- Why it's good: Good for catching jailbreaks and regressions as you update chains
- Cons: Less useful outside the LangChain ecosystem
Red Teaming Services
Examples: Redsafe Labs (or other consultancies) can simulate jailbreak attempts at scale.
- Good for: Periodic audits
Takeaway: Treat evals like tests — run them in CI/CD, not just once at launch.
Monitoring & Incident Response
Even with filters and evals, stuff slips through. Monitoring is your early warning system.
Rafter
- What it does: Real-time detection of jailbreaks, key misuse, and exfiltration patterns
- Why it's good: Gives indie teams an incident response layer they don't have to build from scratch
- Features: Rotate keys, shut down models, alert, and log — all from one place
Application Logging + Vector DB Monitoring
Log:
- Prompts
- Responses
- Vector queries
- Anomalous behavior (e.g., brute force similarity probing)
Can be as simple as Supabase + SQL dashboard or a hosted logging service.
LLM Provider Dashboards
OpenAI usage dashboards can alert you to sudden API spikes — often the first sign of key theft.
Prevention without monitoring is wishful thinking. Even small stacks should have basic telemetry. Start by scanning your repo with Rafter to catch common AI-specific vulnerabilities early.
Putting It All Together — A Reference Indie Security Stack
Here's a simple reference stack you can build in a weekend:
Baseline stack for indie AI apps:
Frontend → Backend/API → Llama Guard + Guardrails
→ Rafter Key Layer → LLM Provider
→ Vector DB Monitoring
→ Evals in CI/CD
Components:
- Prompt filtering (Llama Guard + Guardrails)
- Secure key layer (Rafter + serverless secrets)
- Basic evals (OpenAI Evals / LangKit)
- Monitoring hooks
Takeaway: You don't need a giant enterprise platform. A few focused tools will get you 80% of the way.
Conclusion
Indie AI devs don't have security teams — but you do have access to an increasingly powerful ecosystem of tools. By combining:
- Prompt filtering
- Key management
- Automated evals
- Monitoring
…you can ship fast without flying blind.
Start this week by picking one tool from each category and wiring it up. Your future self (and your users) will thank you.
Related Resources
- AI Agent Security Controls: Defense-in-Depth
- AI Builder Security: 7 New Attack Surfaces You Need to Know
- Building a Threat Model for Your AI App in 30 Minutes
- Prompt Injection 101: How Attackers Hijack Your LLM
- Real-World AI Jailbreaks: How Innocent Prompts Become Exploits
- Silent Exfiltration: How Secrets Leak Through Model Output
- When LLMs Write Code: Trusting Untrusted Outputs
- Vector DBs & Embeddings: The Overlooked Security Risk
- API Keys Explained: Secure Usage for Developers
- Security Tool Comparisons: Choosing the Right Scanner